Goods Rolling Stock
Design
Introduction
One of the difficulties of railway modelling is picking appropriate
rolling stock. First you have to decide on a date and location, then select
wagons and liveries which existed at that date and might be seen in that
location. There are books detailing the rolling stock built by the various
companies and with a little work you can modify existing models and kits to
produce variants and unusual wagon types. The problem here is one of numbers;
the reference books show one or two pictures of each design, whether they were
produced in tens or hundreds, in some cases only a single example of a
particular wagon type was built.
Another problem is that of operational
practice, having wagons in places where they might actually be seen. An example
dear to the hearts of many modellers would be the railway beer wagons, used to
transport barrels of beer from the breweries. These vans would usually travel
in groups however, so you would need to make up at least three or four which is
a long job. This kind of wagon would be quite restricted in its movements,
built for a specific service they would not be used to take beer to a branch
line station for the local pub.
Finally there were many changes in
design introduced over the years which offer numerous traps for the unwary.
Vans built before the 1930's generally had the frame timbers on the outside and
some nineteenth century vans had short tubular 'lamp pots' on the roof which
were the chimneys provided for oil lamps. An example of such a wagon is the
early GWR fruit van with outside framed doors and a single lamp pot on the
roof. A model of this van can be made from a standard Peco Vent Van kit and
this is described in the section on Kit Bashing. Over the years versions of
this van appeared in both grey and brown livery.
Fig ___ Early GWR
fruit van
From reading the general literature you might assume that by the
mid 1920's the lamp pots on the roof would have been removed, and the doors
would have been changed to the inside framed type (as seen on the Peco GWR van)
soon after 1927. In fact these nineteenth century vans (among the very first
fruit vans built) continued in use, unaltered other than for livery, into the
1950's. The model is based on the Peco 'ventilated van' but these vans did not
have the hooded vents on the ends so they need to be trimmed off and they had
flat strapping in the form of an C across the end of the wagon. If I build any
more I will use a Peco 'standard van' with sides cut from a Peco 'Ventilated
van' kit with the doors modified as shown.
Some things did change
however and a good example is the arrangements for supporting tarpaulins on
open wagons. On wagons with no support the tarpaulin cover would tend to form
hollows in which rain water would collect. Tarpaulins were water-proofed with a
mixture of oil and 'lamp black' (better known as soot) but in use tiny 'pin
holes' soon appeared in the fabric resulting in damage to goods carried. This
became a significant problem when the tarpaulin sheet was laid over an ordinary
open wagon and formed a dip in the centre allowing rainwater to collect and
steadily drip through onto the goods below. One solution, used on several early
railways but most common on southern lines, was to build the wagon with raised
ends, usually with a curved top, over which the tarpaulin could be draped.
Quite often there was also a wooden cross bar or length of chain mounted
between the raised ends to support the tarpaulin sheet or 'tilt'. Building
wagons in this way added to the cost and if you need a few thousand that cost
becomes significant. On wagons built in this century the 'patent sheet
supporter' was favoured, consisting of a hinged tubular metal rod fitted to
mountings on the outside ends of the wagon. When raised this formed a ridge
supporting the canvass sheet but when loading or unloading the wagon it could
be lowered to the side out of the way. This still added to the cost of the
wagon however and there was no practical way to reserve these wagons
specifically for high value cargo.
Fig ___ Wagons with tarpaulin
supports
The
companies in the south favoured the raised ends on their open wagons, the post
1923 Southern Railway inherited a large number of this type and built more to
similar designs. The GWR did away with the raised ends from their older rolling
stock in the later nineteenth century but fitted a number of its open wagons
with the hinged metal bar design. The additional cost of these tarpaulin
supporting arrangements meant they were viewed with less enthusiasm in the
north of the country where comparatively few wagons with either raised ends or
patent sheet supporters were built.
As described in the Historical
Background section the railways pooled a number of their wagons under a 'common
user' scheme during and after the First world war. In the years after the war
there was some debate on the relative value of the pooled wagons and the
charges one company could make on another for their use. After some discussion,
in which the northern companies proved reluctant to add tarpaulin rails, the
GWR removed the rails on most 'pooled' wagons shortly after the First World
War. Following the grouping of the railways in 1923 the newly formed Southern
Railway similarly removed the hinged rails and after the mid 1920's they also
started removing the raised ends on their older wagons, converting them to
resemble the standard five plank open design in general use.
Hence in
the 1920's you would still see quite a few GWR wagons with the hinged rails and
wagons from the Southern companies with hinged rails or curved raised ends
(sometimes with a hinged rail as well). Subsequently the GWR and SR wagons
would have no hinged rail, unless marked Non-Common-User, and although some of
the older Southern wagons with raised curved ends survived into the 1940's they
were steadily being replaced by or modified to square ended designs.
The open wagon with its load protected only by a tarpaulin was
vulnerable to pilfering and, on occasion, to the weather. Covered vans offered
advantages for some cargo, particularly high value cargo, but they cost a lot
more to build and maintain. Over the years more and more covered vans were
built and the railways made frequent reference to their van fleets but it was
only in the early 1960's that the van traffic came to predominate.
Another change occurred in the 1960's when the railways changed from
describing a wagon by referring to the load it can carry to the all-up weight
of a loaded wagon or 'Gross Loaded Weight' (GLW). For example the wooden bodied
'twelve ton coal wagon' carried twelve tons of coal, the 'one hundred ton bogie
oil tanker' carries about ninety tons of cargo but weighs in at one hundred
tons when loaded. This change appeared when the weight on the wheels of loaded
goods wagons began approaching the maximum the track could carry. Prior to this
only locomotives were normally restricted by their weight.
Early rolling stock designs
Railway rolling stock
development has been a steady and continuous process. The changes have been
gradual with older stock maintained in service for many years after more modern
designs became available. This longevity was particularly noticeable in the
case of privately owned stock, for example tank wagons built in the last
century were still seen in traffic up to the 1960's. Private Owner vehicles
will be discussed in more detail later.
The rolling stock used on the
early horse-hauled railways was small by modern standards, comparable in size
to the horse drawn carts of the day. In the sketch below the open wagon is a
fairly standard general purpose type seen from the 1820's on many early
railways. The sketch is based on a preserved example dating from the 1830's
from the Stratford & Moreton Railway (which continued in operation with
similar wagons into the 1940's). On horse drawn lines passengers were catered
for with simple open wagons typically fitted with bench seats along the sides.
These were operated singly so there was no need for buffers or couplings. The
standard coal wagon was based on a common design of coal cart, known as a
'chauldron wagon', so named because it carried an Imperial chauldron of coal (the chauldron is actually a unit of volume, corresponding to just under three tons of coal, see also Appendix One).
Fig ___ Nineteenth century horse drawn tramway wagons
The British steam-hauled railways adopted the colliery wagons already in use for moving coal (including the chauldron hopper shown above) and based new rolling stock on simple four wheeled
vehicle designs derived from experience with building road carts. By the 1830's the
carrying capacities were in the region of five tons. The drawings in the sketch
below were sketched from paintings and drawings of the Liverpool &
Manchester Railway done in the 1830's. They are neither accurate in detail or
to any exact scale, neither were the original paintings, but they give some
idea of the general appearance of the rolling stock.
Fig___ Early
Railway Goods Vehicles
By the end of the 1840's the design of British railway goods
rolling stock had evolved and become more railway-like in appearance. Most
wagons were about ten feet long, seven feet wide and with sides about three
feet high. Covered vans were rare but goods brake vans became standard at about
this time (brake vans are discussed in detail later). Wagons of the 1830's and
40's lasted in service for between ten and fifteen years. They were built in
small batches, no real standardisation was applied and repairs were often a
problem.
By the 1850's wagon designs were beginning to settle down as
the companies gained experience of their operational needs and the wagon
builders developed the designs and technologies to meet the new demands. There
were no standards as such, each company building wagons to suit its own railway
and incorporating its own ideas on design. These wagons generally had a life
expectancy of about twenty years.
Fig___ 1850's rolling stock
As wagons began to wander across the system the poor quality of
private owner stock was recognised as a problem for the railway companies. The
Railway Clearing House acted as the liaising authority between the various
companies and in 1887 the RCH issued a standard specification for private owner
wagons (see the Historical Background section for further details of the
Railway Clearing House and its standard specifications for wagons). This RCH
specification was for private owner wagons but using the standard RCH parts
facilitated easy repair and maintenance when the wagon wandered onto another
company line. As a result most railway companies built their own rolling stock
to the same standard specifications. By the end of the century this
standardisation allowed wagons to continue in service much longer than before,
typically for thirty years and occasionally as long as fifty years, as quite
major components were available virtually off the shelf.
The basic
British four wheeled railway wagon or van as built from the turn of the century
would have a nine foot or ten foot wheelbase with a body about seventeen feet
long and about eight feet wide mounted on it. Everything had leaf-spring
suspension and the bearings were mounted on the end of the axles, outside the
wheels. The vehicle would be rated to carry typically eight tons and would be
equipped with only a hand brake. Such a wagon could be easily moved about the
yards by a horse and hooks or holes were provided in the wooden or metal
chassis for attaching chains and a harness for this. If a horse was not
available a man with a long crowbar could get the loaded wagon moving and once
rolling a single man could keep it going on the level. By this time the
original one, two and three plank open wagons, although still common, were
being replaced with higher sided, four and five plank open wagons and an
increasing number of vans. Only in the North West did the three plank open
remain popular and they were built in some number into the 1960's. Open wagons
by this time used metal reinforcing straps but the vans mainly still had heavy
external timber frames. Specialised wagons such as fish and fruit vans and
manure wagons were built in some numbers at about this time. Operating practice
had evolved and become largely standardised and for the next fifty years the
changes were slight.
Fig___ Typical 1890's Goods Vehicles