Return to index page

Specialised Rolling Stock.

By 1850 small wagons were built with a single 'bolster'. A bolster is a block of timber laid across the wagon to support the load, generally with a vertical post or rod at each end to prevent the load sliding sideways. The bolster wagons usually had a short wheelbase, typically seven foot, and a single swivelling bolster mounted on a flat wooden deck. These were called `single bolster wagons' and would be assembled in two's or three's or even sixes to carry long loads such as timber and metal sections. Some wagons had low sides (as seen on the Peco model) whilst others had no sides or ends at all. The single bolsters were sometimes built as fixed pairs permanently coupled together. These paired wagons sometimes had a combined buffer-coupling between them although early designs had dumb buffers with a fixed chain coupling. The Peco range includes a pair of single bolster wagons, but these are on standard ten foot wheel base chassis suggesting they date from immediately prior to World War Two. They can be cut down however and converting these to the shorter vehicles is discussed in the section on 'Kit Bashing'.

Fig ___ Models of Great Central bolster wagons made using the Peco kit as a basis Models of Great Central bolster wagons made using the Peco kit as a basis

Modelling these and similar wagons was fully described in Railway Modeller Nov 2001 (Traffic for Tickling Article 6).

From about 1890 specialised vehicles started to appear in greater numbers in response to traffic demand. Larger companies had forty or fifty different designs of vehicles for specialised traffic but non-standard wagons were only built in small numbers. There were large numbers of horses at work right into the 1940's and several companies built manure wagons. The horses also required a lot of hay and several companies built high sided open wagons to carry this (the GWR provender wagons had higher sides than the then standard vans).

Most companies had a few open wagons with a wooden floor but no sides or ends. They were usually fitted with securing rings along the sides of the wood or steel chassis and were intended to carry large objects. Introduced in the early twentieth century they were never terribly common, from published material the North East had more than other areas although the LMS built some of this type to carry planks of imported timber. Most imported timber planks were Scandinavian soft wood, known as 'deal' and these wagons were called 'deal wagons' by the LMS. British Railways built a few of these open flat wagons (to an LNER design) in the 1950's.

By the early years of the twentieth century some bulk trades justified the building high capacity wagons of up to 20 tons or so. As well as coal and coke there was bulk traffic in bricks, hammerscale, road stone, slag, oil cake, timber, manure and grain.

A high volume but low weight cargo was coke, large quantities of which were used in a number of industries both as a fuel and as a raw material. Although the value of coke was low the quantities involved justified the building of specialised coke wagons. These resembled conventional mineral wagons but were built with higher bodies. The sketch below is a Midland Railway coke wagon design which saw service into the 1960's and possibly the very early 1970's.

Fig ___ Midland Railway Coke Wagon Sketches and photo of model of the MR standard coke wagon

Modelling these MR coke wagons in N was described in Railway Modeller Sept 2001 (Traffic for Tickling Article 5)

Grain Wagons

The LSWR built twenty open eight plank ten ton hopper grain wagons with curved raised ends in the 1890's. These were used for grain imports from Southampton and lasted forty years before being replaced. The tarpaulin covers on these wagons would only have been removed for loading, so a simple box of scribed card with strapping detail from 10x20 thou microstrip, end supports from 30x30 thou microstrip and a paper 'tarpaulin' would suffice. The LSWR wagons had curved raised ends, these were replaced by the Southern Railway in the 1930's with re-built wagons with patent tarpaulin rails.

Fig ___ LSWR grain wagon in early SR livery LSWR grain wagon in early SR livery

The GWR had experimented with various ways of handling bulk grain. They had converted twenty or so ten ton standard vans for bulk grain traffic, they then tried a 'convertible' eight ton open wagon. This latter had a floor fitted with two hinged sections which lifted and laid back against the ends to form a hopper. This was intended to reduce the empty wagon mileage by allowing it to be used for normal traffic. Neither of these was a great success but in 1927 they built twelve convertible twenty ton bulk grain hopper vans.

These grain wagons had a ten foot six inch wheel base but a body about twenty foot long, inside was a double version of the hinged floor idea, dropping into two discharge points underneath. The wheelbase was kept as short as possible to allow the wagons to negotiate the tight curves in the docks. There were two sets of heavily framed double doors on each side as well as the grain loading roof hatches, the doors were fitted with heavy padlocks to avoid some clot opening them when the van was full of grain. The twelve GWR vans were switched to bulk cement traffic in the 1930's, at which time the side doors were screwed shut and the roof profile was lowered as shown in the sketch. They were re-converted for grain in 1940, at which time the hoppers were fixed in place, the side doors were removed and the roof reverted to the high arched profile.

Fig ___ GWR Grain & Cement Vans GWR grain hopper vans and related cement conversion

The LNER built twenty five grain vans to the original GWR design. These vans proved popular but were seldom used for traffic other than grain so when demand increased and further LNER vehicles were built these had a fixed hopper and no side doors. The convertible types used by the GWR and LNER were identical, the versions with no side doors differed only in the strapping detail on their sides and the later LNER design had two roof hatches in place of the original single hatch. Note the small inspection hatch on the side of the later LNER van was fitted on one side only.

Fig ___ LNER Grain Vans LNER standard grain vans

The LMS inherited a number of bulk grain hopper wagons built by the Midland Railway in about 1922. These were based on a standard Midland van of the period, similar to the kit available from the N Gauge Society but with the diagonal strap going the other way. In spite of the preference by traders for wooden bodied grain hoppers the LMS built over a hundred grain hopper wagons with steel bodies in the 1920's. The GWR built a small fleet of twelve essentially similar steel wagons in the mid 1930's. Both designs were of twenty tons capacity and retained the ten foot six inch wheelbase with the long overhang at each end. The LMS version had external 'L' shaped strapping on the sides whereas the GWR hoppers had smooth sides. These pre nationalisation bulk grain wagons were used for imported grain, most British grain was still shipped in sacks, transported in standard vans and sheeted open wagons.

Fig ___ GWR one-off, early MR/LMS and later LMS/BR and GWR/BR steel Grain Vans. Photo showing models of GWR one-off, early MR/LMS and later LMS/BR and GWR/BR steel Grain Vans

The GW wooden van was a one-off (built in 1905) but quite a few of the MR/LMS vans were built. On the layout these wooden vans were used in the docks at Fettling on Sea (the MR type were used in that way into the early years of BR). The hopper discharge hand wheels are just Gimp pins (from a sewing shop) painted black and with the rim and spokes in white. These vans all had a single such wheel. The steel grain van models were made using the Peco Grano long wheelbase grain hopper as a basis. This was after the possibility of doing so had been pointed out to me by Alastair Knox of West Brent fame. These also have Gimp Pin handwheels, but for some reason I photographed the wrong side.

BR built their own steel bodied grain hoppers, very similar in design to those built by the LMS although there were differences in the outside strapping (the LMS had angle section across the curve of the roof, BR used flat strapping, much easier to model). BR built a number of similar grain vans on a slightly different vacuum brake fitted chassis. Modelling all these variants is discussed in the section on Kit Bashing.

The photo below, courtesy of Dapol, shows their N Gauge BR era grain wagon.

Dapol grain van in N. Photo copyright Dapol

The LMS and GWR steel grain hoppers, and their wooden GWR and LNER predecessors, remained in use into the mid 1970's and were seen all over the country, so you can add a couple of odd ones to a rake of Dapol hoppers. The Peco `Grano' is a good example of the leased wagon, introduced in 1965 and built in batches up to 1971, the first batch was built by by Pressed Steel Co. for a company called BRT (British Railway Traffic & Electric Company, formed in 1907 and bought by Procor in 1974). These were painted all over blue and were mainly leased to the Distiller Co and used for hauling barley from the South East up to Scotland for the distillieries.

Beer & Ale Wagons

Several companies built or converted vans for 'ale' or beer traffic, these were usually called 'ale wagons'. The beer travelled in barrels and was not liable to weather damage, but it had to be kept cool so the rolling stock used was well ventilated. The Midland Railway built vans with open slatted sides similar to milk vans, the Great Eastern converted some standard vans by drilling large numbers of one inch diameter holes in the sides and ends and the GWR used redundant cattle trucks. Cattle trucks provided plenty of ventilation with their open upper sides and gaps between the lower planks on the sides as described below. The photograph, courtesy of Dapol, shows their OO scale model of a BR standard cattle wagon re-branded for beer traffic.

Fig ___ Beer Vans
Dapol beer wagon model in OO. Photo copyright Dapol


Cattle trucks are called trucks rather than vans because they were originally open wagons with timber rail sides. In the 1890's the Board of Agriculture ruled that cattle trucks should be fitted with spring buffers at both ends and better footholds and in 1904 rules were introduced requiring cattle trucks to have a roof. Many companies had been fitting a roof since the 1860's, prior to that date many cattle wagons were open and at best had a tarpaulin stretched over the top to provide shelter. The 1904 rules stipulated a need for ventilation (the open upper sides common since the 1850's served for this), openings to allow inspection at floor level and that they should be fitted with falling doors to form an access ramp. The open upper sides, usually with one or two horizontal iron bars, provided adequate ventilation, inspection at floor level was already catered for in that wagons had openings along the lower sides to allow the muck to be washed out and the falling doors were already standard. Some companies interpreted the inspection openings rather differently, leaving a gap of two or three planks in height on the lower sides and fitting this with a railing of closely spaced vertical iron rods. This latter approach is much more difficult to model.

Cattle travel standing up so to prevent them being thrown about they had to be pushed in so they supported each other. There were three agreed standard sizes of cattle wagon, small (thirteen foot six inches long), medium (fifteen foot six inches long) and large (eighteen foot long). By the turn of the century only the large type was in production but this was fitted with a moveable partition to convert it into a medium or small size. Livestock vans, along with fish and milk carrying vehicles, were among the first goods stock to run in passenger trains and express goods trains. Screw couplings and vacuum brakes were often fitted to cattle wagons but there were also quite a number of unfitted wagons in service and unfitted cattle wagons with a hand brake on one side only survived into the 1930's.

Fig___ Models of cattle wagons

N Gauge models of cattle wagons

(1) Farish van in MR livery with added roof strips. (2) Peco cattle wagon in unfitted BR livery. (3) Peco cattle wagon with added roof strips and doors modified to represent the standard GWR design. (4) A Graham Hughes whitemetal kit of a fitted GCR cattle wagon (mounted on a Minitrix chassis as I made a mess of the kit chassis - This should have clasp brakes). (5) A small cattle wagon made for a light railway layout, a shortened version of a standard NER design (this appears to have been a commercial vehicle, used by several companies). (6) The Graham Farish fish van looks like a goods wagon but in practice this would most likely be part of a rake of fish vans or possibly attached to a passenger train. The model is accurate but really should have vacuum brake pipes on the ends and a vacuum brake cylinder mounted underneath, it was actually a Great Northern design, to back date it just replace the N E with G N. More information on fish traffic is included in the section on 'Operations - Non Passenger Coaching Stock'. Horse boxes, which were designed to run in passenger trains, were similarly classed as Non Passenger Coaching Stock, as were 'prize cattle vans', which tended to broadly resemble horse boxes but tended (from what I have seen) to be slightly larger.

One sometimes sees pictures of cattle wagons with white interiors and white stains on their sides caused by `lime washing' the insides of the wagons as a way of disinfecting them. The interior of these wagons should be all white and the liquid leaked out between the planks as well as through the built-in openings. There would be patches of white all over the body but mainly where there were gaps such as the openings at the bottom and around the open upper sides. This practice was banned in the 1920's, so the stains should not appear on Big Four or British Railways stock.

Perishables traffic in goods trains

Perishables, as the name suggests, need to be transported quickly and efficiently. Milk and fish are classic examples of this kind of traffic but as noted above these were normally transported in 'passenger rated' stock, discussed in more detail in the section on 'Operations - Non Passenger Coaching Stock'.

Meat, fruit, butter, eggs, fruit and vegetables all required a lot of ventilation to keep them cool in transit. Ordinary ventilated vans did not provide sufficient air flow so special vans were built for this traffic with extra ventilation in the sides and ends. Many of these vehicles were equipped to travel attached to passenger trains (equipped with a vacuum brake and classified as XP (express) stock). At times of high demand, such as the harvesting of seasonal fruits and vegetables, cattle wagons were regularly pressed into service. These were often fitted with a vacuum brake and the openings in the upper and lower sides provided plenty of ventilation (but a tarpaulin was usually added over the top of the vehicle to prevent pilfering). Open wagons were also regularly used for this traffic, the load being covered with a tarpaulin or two. Some open wagons were fitted with a raised framework to enable them to carry bulky but not very heavy loads such as vegetables. My model, built for a light railway layout, is a slightly modified Peco seven plank wagon kit. The model is loosely based on a wagon built by the Great Northern railway, the GN wagon was rather longer. Making the frame and modelling the GN wagon (without the frame) are discussed in the section on Kit Bashing.

Fig ___ Wagon fitted with slatted frame for vegetable traffic Model of a wagon fitted with a slatted frame for vegetable traffic

As the pattern of traffic changed over the years most companies converted redundant rolling stock to cater for new traffic. Cattle traffic had been in decline since the mid 1930's and the LNER and GWR had experimented with converting cattle wagons for fruit traffic. The GWR conversion involved boarding up the gap at the top of the side and fitting standard vertically planked hinged doors, similar to the doors on the Peco ventilated van. This was a successful conversion and further examples were built by British Railways, still based on the standard cattle wagon but built from new as fruit vans. Modelling details for this vehicle will be found in the section on 'Kit Bashing'. The example shown is a GWR conversion in early BR bauxite livery as it was fitted with a vacuum brake.

Fig ___ GWR/BR fruit van conversion GWR/BR cattle wagon to fruit van conversion

The model represents a converted cattle wagon with simple 'boarded up' upper sides, the later versions had louvers (much harder to model) and slightly different side strapping. An example is shown in the section on Post Nationalisation wagon development. The model is based on a Peco cattle van with a set of doors left over from another conversion of a Peco van (actually a BR 'tin can van' conversion discussed in the Section on Post Nationalisation wagon development). The rectangular sign on the side is supposed to represent a 'traders label', this one was actually cut from the thin paper wrapper on a pot of herbs. Traders labels are discussed in the section on Livery.

The photo below, courtesy of Dapol, shows their OO scale BR fruit van.
Dapol fruit van model in OO. Photo copyright Dapol

Sugar beet was produced in considerable quantities after the First World War and at harvest time it was standard practice to ship the beets in any available open wagons, including coal wagons, to get them to the processing plants in time. These wagons were not sheeted over when carrying beets.

By the end of the nineteenth century steam power was having an increasing impact on international shipping and live beef was brought in from Ireland and the Americas. These animals were slaughtered at abattoirs close by the ports, the meat being forwarded by rail. Ventilated meat vans were introduced in the 1870's and shipments of meat soon began to replace movements of live cattle into the towns. The LSWR used a single basic ventilated van design for meat vans and fruit traffic, both requiring similar handling. These outside framed vans had gaps in the planking on the upper door and upper and lower sides but these were covered by planked covers that were flush with the framing. The fruit van had two roof ventilators, mounted on the centreline of the roof, but did not always carry the word FRUIT on the door. These vans had lower than normal roofs, which adds interest to a rake on a layout and some survived into the early years of British Railways.
Modelling the more common version of these vans (without the side ventilation, was described in Railway Modeller Jan 2002 (traffic for Tickling Article 7). To produce a meat or fruit van you simply need to fill in the areas as shown on the sketch with Milliput and scribe these to represent planking. The model described has a single end vent, some of the fruit and meat vans were similarly equipped but other had up to five vents on each end.

Fig ___ LSWR Meat/Fruit Vans LSWR Meat and Fruit Vans

Ventilated meat vans equipped with hooks on which the fresh meat was hung were built in some numbers, even small companies would often have a couple of these.

With the arrival of chilled meat brought in by sea in the later nineteenth century insulated and refrigerated meat vans appeared. The frozen sides of meat were wrapped in Hessian cloth and stacked up inside these vans. The GWR used a single basic design for both insulated and refrigerated meat wagons. The N Gauge Society offer a rather neat kit of the type, complete with transfers, but my model was made many years ago from a sanded-down Peco 'standard van' with planking scribed on the sides and end vent covers added from scribed card bedded into Milliput. The photo was taken before the lettering was complete.

Fig ___ GWR insulated and ventilated van GWR MICA insulated and ventilated van

By the mid 1930's most meat traffic was carried in special containers (coded BM) each carrying four tons of meat hanging on hooks. These containers are sketched in the section on Unit Loads. The LNER used to see entire trains of BM containers on special Conflat wagons travelling down from Scotland to London, but the meat was often bruised in transit.

Bananas became a regular cargo in the 1920's, they were unloaded from ships is an unripe 'green' condition and shipped in specially built vans which were both insulated and fitted with steam heating coils. The heating was applied as the train made its way to the town and began, or accelerated, the ripening process. The Peco ventilated van is a model of a GWR standard design dating back to the late nineteenth century. The vertically planked doors on the Peco model were introduced in 1927, the original design featured horizontally planked 'outside framed doors'. The metal 'bonnet' end vents were introduced in 1912 and in 1919 some of these vans were lined with insulation to carry chilled cargo. The vents were blanked off inside when the insulation was installed. In 1922 the vans were modified to carry bananas which had to be heated in transit. The insulation was retained but a new central vent was fitted to each end, and the white spot was applied to help staff identify these converted vans. The livery on the Peco GWR van is a hybrid, the lettering is correct for a ventilated van but the big white spot was only applied to vans converted to carry bananas. For a ventilated van the white spot needs to be scraped off but the remainder of the lettering is fine. For a banana van the word 'ventilated' on the lower left of the body needs to be changed to read 'banana van' (small white dots will do for this).

The Peco 'Ventilated' van makes a passable BR banana van, which was itself based on an LMS standard design insulated van derived from a pre-grouping design which seems to have been used with minor variations by several companies. BR banana vans had a yellow disk, eighteen inches in diameter, with the vehicles tare weight on it in black in roughly the same position as the GWR's white disk. The pre-grouping vans had only the top and bottom hinges on the doors, but removing the middle pair without this being obvious is difficult. The LMS vehicles were originally refrigerator vans with roof hatches but with the change from water ice to carbon dioxide 'dry ice' the roof hatches were removed. Similar vans but with a ventilator in each end were built for banana traffic. In BR days the end ladders were removed.
Modelling the GWR and LMS/BR banana vans was discussed in Railway Modeller Jan 2002 Traffic for Tickling article 7.

Long & High Load Wagons

As noted above the first solution to transporting long loads was the rake of small wagons fitted with bolsters. Introduced in the 1850's they were still being built in the early 1960's but fell from favour soon thereafter. As iron and steel technology improved wagon size was generally increasing and by the 1890's longer loads were becoming more common, among them long rail lengths for which long wheel base and bogie bolster wagons were built. 'Long rail' and 'Plate' wagons were low sided long wheel base vehicles, designed to shift thirty foot lengths of rail, large metal sheets or bundles of rods. They were also often used to move agricultural machinery and smaller road vehicles as the drop sides meant they could be relatively easily loaded from the side and did not require special end-loading facilities. There is a photograph in R. J. Essery's book 'Midland Wagons Volume One' showing a Rolls Royce motor car chassis being crane lifted onto such a wagon in about 1920. The Peco range includes a long wheel base plate wagon based on an LNER/LMS design dating from the early 1940's. The chassis requires some work to improve this model but it can also serve as the basis for a number of older designs, details will be found in the section on 'Kit Bashing'

The four wheeled plate wagons were often fitted with bolsters and put into service to augment the existing single bolster wagons and permanently coupled single bolster pairs. Again these can be modelled using existing RTR wagons or kits, most of mine have been made using the Peco plate wagon as the basis.

Fig ___ Peco Plate wagon converted into a Great Northern twin bolster wagon. Peco Plate wagon converted into a Great Northern twin bolster wagon

Modelling this vehicle was described in Railway Modeller March 2001 (Traffic for Tickling Article 12). The 'chains' are made up from two strands of 5 Amp fuse wire twisted together.

'Pipe' wagons were built to carry clay drainage pipes (packed in straw). These were long four wheeled wagons with four or five plank sides and a wheelbase of about twelve feet. Parkside Dundas offer a kit of a 12 foot wheel base pipe wagon, a pre-war LNER design which remained in service into the later 1980's. Some were still in use in departmental service in the late 1990's.

Even longer high sided wagons were built after the First World War with wheelbases of up to twenty foot. These were usually called 'tube' wagons (the Peco 'tube wagon' is a model of a British Railways wagon built in the 1950's for use on train ferries to the continent). The GWR 'tube' wagon, coded Open C, was a four plank design on a fifteen foot wheel base, the LMS had a five plank wagon on a seventeen foot wheel base with a central door and the LNER built some wagons on a fifteen foot wheelbase with no side door. Modelling notes for GWR, LNER, LMS and British Railways (steel-ended) tube wagons have been included in the section on 'Kit Bashing'. Note the asymmetric brake gear shown on the ex LNER wagon was their standard design for vacuum braked stock and was adopted by BR.

Fig ___ Pre-war tube wagons in BR liveries Pre-war tube wagons in BR liveries

Where long wagons were required to carry heavy loads a six wheeled chassis was used although these were never really common. I have described my way of modelling these chassis in the section on Kit Bashing. Some of these six wheeler vehicles had surprisingly long lives, and a few of these older vehicles survived into the 1950's. The six wheeled van shown was built by the North British Railway before the First World War and lasted into the early years of British Railways fifty years later.

Fig ___ North British Railway 15 Ton Van NBR 6 wheeled 15 Ton Van

For carrying items that were more than about thirty feet long bogie wagons were required. Most common were the bogie bolster wagons, generally these carried four or five bolsters. These long wagons were in use by the early twentieth century and bogie bolsters were built with up to seven separate bolsters mounted on a single body. Usually the bolsters were removable and there were often more mounting points than bolsters, allowing different arrangements for different loads. Bogie bolster wagons were built in some numbers just before the First World War and a number of fairly standard lengths were established. Shortest were the twenty ton wagons which were typically thirty five feet long, the thirty ton wagons were generally about forty five feet long and forty ton wagons tended to be fifty to fifty two feet long. The GWR built a few seventy foot long bogie bolster wagons in the pre-grouping era but these were of course very restricted in routes due to their length. British Railways built a number of sixty two foot long bogie wagons for carrying lengths of rail coding them Borail. These were always assigned to the departmental stock and were not used for commercial loads.

By the late 1960's bolster wagons of all types were used almost exclusively for steel traffic. The single bolster wagons and pairs were phased out by the mid 1970's, the four wheeled bolster wagons lasted only a few years longer and by the late 1980's only the bogie types remained in service. On modern stock steel bolsters which fold down into the floor have been provided in some cases, these also help to dissipate heat from freshly milled steel ingots.

The same chassis were also used for bogie plate wagons although these were not so common. Most bogie plate wagons were built with drop down sides, typically two planks high and arranged in two half-length sections. Some of the bogie bolsters were subsequently converted to plate wagons and on these the sides were usually fixed. The N Gauge Society offer a plastic kit of an LMS five-bolster bogie wagon which saw service into the 1970's. Several of these wagons were converted to plate wagons with fixed sides two planks high by both the LMS and British Railways.

Any items larger than about fifty foot long or over eight feet wide were classed as 'special traffic' because of the danger they might foul stock on adjacent tracks when in transit. These items were rather rare in practice and would usually be worked through the system during a low traffic period, usually over a weekend. Anything wider than about eight foot presented a real problem on the railways, laid flat it would be likely to foul stock on adjacent tracks and line side equipment, on end it would foul bridges. To allow larger sheets of metal to be carried some four wheeled and bogie plate wagons were fitted with a wooden trestle so the load could be supported diagonally. This allowed loads of up to about 12 feet wide to be carried.

Fig ___ Peco plate wagons converted to trestle wagons

NER three legged trestle wagon model

Modelling the BR and four-legged NE trestle wagons was described in Railway Modeller March 2003 (Traffic for Tickling Article 14). The model of the three-legged type shown here was an earlier attempt and not quite up to the same standard. It was based on a drawing in Peter Tatlow's book on LNER wagons (see Bibliography)

One option for carrying tall loads was of course to lower the centre of the vehicle and drop centered or 'well' wagons were built on both bogie and four wheeled chassis One specialised variant on this theme were the wagons built to carry road vehicles, these are discussed in more detail below.

The more general purpose drop centre vehicles usually called 'trolley wagons' by railwaymen. Unfortunately a lot of these wagons had an open framework with no floor in the centre well, making a model of an unloaded vehicle a rather difficult proposition. Most of the official photographs of these wagons are taken from the side, so the floor is not visible, a little research is therefore required when selecting a prototype.

Fig ___ Long and Low Centre Wagons Sketches showing various extra long and Low Centre Wagons<

Fleishmann offer a continental drop-centred four wheeler in their range which, although it does not resemble any particular British design, can be pressed into service. Filing the sides of the floor plates so they are parallel helps and for a British wagon the hinged side stakes should be removed.

These vehicles are not impossible to model, especially if one take a freelance DIY approach rather than trying to produce an accurate scale replica of one of the prototypes. On the plus side they were often fitted with removable longitudinal beams, mounted on raised bolsters on the end platforms. Adding these beams gives a box structure which should cope with the average model railway handling. Modelling drop centre four wheeled wagons is considered in the section on Kit Bashing.

My model is based on the smallest type I could find, a 1930's LMS design, as I wanted the look of the thing but did not want it to take up a disproportionate amount of room on the layout. The prototype was equipped with two heavy longitudinal baulks, as shown in the sketch above, although these would not have been carried if, for example, the load was a caterpillar tractor of some kind. My model was built with removable timber baulks, one pair loosely wrapped in chain (set solid with glue), the other pair with a ships propeller mounted between them. This was never a great success as an idea as I failed to make provision for mounting the baulks using locating pins and holes in the end supporting timbers, as a result the load tended to wander off to the side as the wagon vibrated. I intend to repaint the model in early BR grey and will probably just glue a pair of timbers in place.

Fig ___ Relatively short well wagon model Photo of a Relatively short LMS well wagon model

In the 1930's large steam powered and later diesel excavators and bulldozers appeared. The railways had already built bogie and four wheeled wagons with a very low dropped centre section to carry very large loads such as boilers. The centre was dropped as low as possible, so it was not practical to add ramps for end-loading but they could be used for the new machines as their caterpillar tracks allowed them to be loaded from the side and turned on the wagon itself. The low centred bogie wagons were called Weltrol (well-centred trolley wagons) by British Railways and when fitted with a trestle they became 'Trestrol'. Fleetline offer a kit of a bogie well wagon, resembling a GWR design dating from the 1930's but running on Graham Farish diamond frame bogies. They also offer the same wagon fitted with a trestle for large plate loads. The N Gauge Society offers an excellent plastic kit of an LMS bogie well wagon and the kit includes an set of etched brass trestles. In the Bachman range is a 'fifty two foot' bogie well wagon which scales out at about forty eight foot in British N. This model was originally supplied with a 'rocket load' but it is now also (I believe) available empty. This model, although a few millimeters short, resembles a British 'Warwell' built in the Second World War to carry tanks. These vehicles survived well into the British Railways era, some being converted to carry steel by fitting them with raised bolsters in the centre well. Parkwood models have now released kits for both the Warwell and Warflat wagons (the latter are discussed below).

Heavy Loads

In the early days of the railways two tons was a substantial load. By the 1840's eight ton loads were not uncommon but anything over about fifteen tons was really too heavy for the track. By the 1850's solidly built six wheeled 'boiler trucks' were built to carry loads of twenty tons and by the mid 1860's eight wheeled boiler trucks were built that could carry forty tons. By the 1890's the use of armour plate in battleships and heavy castings in industry had increased for which the railway companies built increasingly heavy wagons. The example shown below was built by the Great Central Railway at about the time of the First World War. This vehicle is a practical proposition for the novice model maker, the chassis is a Peco brake van chassis with the foot boards, running gear and coupling pockets removed. The decking is a sheet of 1mm scribed card and the wagon runs on standard Graham Farish diamond frame goods bogies.

Fig ___ Great Central/LNER Armour Plate Wagon GC or LNER Armour Plate Wagon

For larger heavy items the railway companies built articulated sets of heavily framed wagons with a total length of up to fifty foot. These could be separated into individual wagons and used to transport longer loads, but used in that way they would run as special traffic to avoid the risk of accidents to line-side fixtures or stock passing on an inner curve. They were usually called 'boiler trucks' by the railways but different companies had different telegraphic codes (the GWR called the Pollen for example). No models are commercially available for these wagons but a pair of Graham Farish tender chassis could be used to produce something essentially similar. If you wish to work the pair empty I suggest making up a couple of heavy timber beams mounted on and chained down to the pivoting supports. Beams such as these were sometimes fitted to these wagons to support a boiler or similar load.

Fig ___ Heavy Boiler Trucks Heavy Boiler Trucks

From the middle of the First World War the Army required railway wagons to transport their new tanks but driving one of these over the end of a standard design wagon in an end loading dock would exceed the maximum permitted axle loading. To cater for this traffic the railways built, with Government financial assistance, a number of bogie vehicles with supporting jacks built in to the ends. These are usually referred to as 'rectanks', their standard telegraphic code name. These wagons had a slightly dropped centre section with the ends angled upwards slightly to the buffer beam. This makes them difficult to model. Another military design from this era which ended up in general use was the 'warflat', which did not have the dropped centre. During the Second World War the tall American tanks presented a problem so a new design was introduced. This was the warwell, a drop centred wagon with ends that curved up to a flat section over the buffers. The Parkwood models range includes a kit for the warflat and warwell wagons but I had a couple of Roco fish-belly wagon (reference number 2352S) which I used to represent the warflat vehicles. Warwell and Warflats remained in service well into the British Railways era. Some of the shorter warflat wagons, only thirty four feet over headstocks, were eventually converted to heavy strip coil carrying wagons, coded Coil K.

In 1926 the Electricity (Supply) Act was passed, which lead to the development of the National Grid. This brought a requirement for large electrical transformers and the railway companies built several special wagons to transport these. The early transformers were of moderate size and the wagons built to move them were roughly the same size as standard wagon. They usually had a well or dropped centre section to accommodate the tall transformers within the loading gauge. The size of transformers kept increasing, and in the years before World War Two increasingly larger vehicles were built to move them. Some of the later designs were heavily built contraptions with heavy I girders running between six wheeled bogies, similar to the earlier wagons developed for large naval guns and the like. These would be rare and as far as I am aware there are no kits or suitable ready to run models available.

As the rearmament of the later 1930's gathered pace more armour plate carrying vehicles were required. The LMS and LNER shared a common design twenty four foot over headstocks and running on six foot wheelbase bogies. Introduced in 1937 these fifty five ton wagons also carried billets of steel, heavy castings and the like. British Railways built more wagons to this design and also built a number of similar but longer wagons. These were still rated at fifty five tons but they were thirty foot over headstocks and ran on eight foot wheelbase bogies. These longer wagons were fitted with oval buffer heads.

Both types had a flat planked wooden deck and a simple I section steel frame running on six foot wheelbase bogies. You could build the chassis using two strips of Plastruct I section for the sides, glued to the underside of a rectangle of 1mm scribed card for the floor, this however makes fettling the buffer beans slightly more difficult. The generic coach bogies offered by Graham Farish can be used at a pinch. The approach shown below works (I have built bogie wagon chassis in the same way in the past) and results in a stronger joint for the bogie mountings.

Fig ___ Armour Plate Wagons Sketches of various armour plate wagons

Glass Wagons

Special wagons with lowered centre sections or 'wells' and supporting side frames used for carrying large sheets of plate glass and larger ships propellers appeared in the 1880's. These wagons were never very common but being little used they tended to have a long life. The Great Eastern built only two glass wagons, one in 1899 the second in 1914, but both survived into British Railways ownership. Plate glass was an expensive item, shipped packed into flat wooden cases. The NER glass wagon shown below dates from 1896 but remained in use for many years, the supports stood about eight feet above the top of the chassis solebars, the sketch shows the vehicle in its post-1923 LNER livery (for modelling details see the section on Kit Bashing).

Fig ___ Great Northern/North Eastern Railway glass wagon Sketch of a Great Northern/North Eastern Railway glass wagon

In transit a chain was added over the top of the load, secured to the side supports, when not in use these chains were left across the ends between the frames. As the load on the models were to be removable the chains were attached to the case. My model was made for a kiddie and had a removable load, as a result I did not take as much care as I might have when making the well. On the model shown the well is rather short, to make sure it did not foul the axles, if care is taken, and the floor of the well is either sloped or stepped at the ends a more accurate well can be made.

Fig ___ GN glass wagon model Model of GN glass wagon

The LNWR operated some essentially similar wagons, although the brake gear was different (still operating on a single wheel on each side) and there was no cut-away at the ends. The supports were again about eight feet tall from the solebars (just over seven and a half feet above the wagon floor), and I believe they were closer together than on the GNR wagon (I could be wrong on that). On the LNWR wagon the supports had L section cross-bars at the top and bottom of the loops and diagonal supports at the base of the loops leading toward the wagon ends. As my model was for a child I felt these would be too vulnerable so he got the GNR version. The only photo I have seen of these LNWR wagons was captioned that they were withdrawn shortly before the grouping but I think that was a particular batch and similar wagons with a metal 'well' may well have been built after that time.

Fig ___ LNWR glass wagon Model of GN glass wagon

The LNWR also adopted a useful conversion of a one plank wagon, fitted with the same design of frame (again with cross bars at the top and bottom of the loops) and this represents a simple conversion to a Peco bolster wagon. The original design used a long-lever brake, operating on one wheel on each side, however as some of these short glass wagons, first introduced in the 1890s, survived into the LMS era you might get away with unaltered Peco brakes for a refurbished wagon. As I understand it the standard glass case was eight feet high and up to three feet thick (although most would be only about a foot thick), so these wagons had a thinner than normal floor to keep within the loading gauge.

Fig ___ LNWR short glass wagon Model of GN glass wagon

The LMS/LNER selected a joint standard design of unfitted glass wagon, following established practice these had a sunken well in the centre section and metal frames fitted with adjustable screw-clamps to the sides to support the load. The British Railways plate glass wagon design was identical to this twenty foot wheel base LMS/LNER vehicle.

The design of this LMS/LNER/British Railways glass wagon makes it tricky to model but I have included some ideas on this in the 'Kit Bashing' section. Glass wagons were not numerous, but one on a layout would be acceptable, more if you have a glass factory on or near your line (see Volume Two - Glass Works for details of modelling these establishments). They were also used for occasional unusual loads where their dropped centres were an advantage, such as steel sections and coal mine pit-head winding wheels. There are photographs in various books of British Railways wagons being used to move large metal rings with gear teeth on the outside edge as part of a special train, this was actually a dismantled cement kiln being moved from one location to another.

Fig ___ LMS/LNER/British Railways glass wagon LMS/LNER/British Railways glass wagon

Wagons for Road Vehicles & Farm Machinery

Standard horse drawn delivery wagons and the like could be moved on any open vehicle long enough to accommodate them. Most were shipped singly and carried on flat wagons of typically of ten to twelve foot wheelbase. When for example the army needed to move a number of such wagons bogie flat wagons were used.

Wagons with low centre sections are generally called 'trolley wagons', they first appeared in the 1870's and were used for carrying larger road vehicles, farm machinery, boilers and other large loads. Depending on the intended load these were called carriage trucks, implement wagons, machine trucks, road vehicle wagons, furniture van trucks and boiler trolleys.

In practice those intended for commercial wheeled vehicles and agricultural machinery were used on an as-required basis, depending on the size of the load. Those intended for private carriages, and later motor cars, usually had bars across the vehicles. In many cases these consisted of a timber beam with a steel rail running along the top. The carriage or car was secured to this bar using leather or heavy webbing straps. The example shown below is an LNWR vehicle and this was slightly different. The loops that look like hand rails on top of the side rails were ratcheted guides, in which moveable brackets were fitted, to which the straps were attached. The cross-bars on the model are tucked under the loops for strength, on the prototype these were bent down at each end and fitted into holes on a steel plate. The steel plates were fitted at each end of the side rails and extended for about a third of the body length. The plates were therefore rather longer than the ratchet loops. The securing straps are not modelled, partly because I was lazy but partly because the wagon usually runs with a small car (from a Christmas cracker) as a load. The straps could be represented using narrow strips of paper (about 0.75mm wide), on this prototype they were a very pale colour, possibly white. Machinery trucks in contrast relied on chains or ropes attached to heavy metal rings attached to the floor, or occasionally to the sides of the solebars. Fold down flaps were often fitted which bridged the gap over the buffers, so the load could be manoeuvred onto the wagon in a special 'end loading dock' or 'carriage shoot' (discussed later under Railway Company Goods Facilities). On some vehicles the buffers were covered by a fixed metal hood serving the same purpose.

These vehicles sometimes had smaller than normal wheels and a lower than normal floor, however they had to buffer and couple with standard wagons so the ends were of normal height and the floor sloped down forming a 'well' in the centre. Where the intended load was not particularly large, such as most farm machinery, the dip in the centre of the wagon was not very pronounced. Modelling these vehicles is not difficult providing one is prepared to accept a slight compromise in the design and this is discussed in detail in the section on Kit Bashing.

Where the dip required was greater a longer wheelbase was employed, allowing the ramped ends to be at a suitably gentle angle. Models of these long wheelbase low centred vehicles (usually called Lowmacs as an abbreviation for Low Machinery Wagons) are available from Fleetline (a white metal kit) and N Gauge Society (a plastic kit). The Fleetline 'Lowmac' is a British Railways built wagon but closely resembles Great Western Railway and Southern Railway vehicles dating from the 1930's (basically similar vehicles were in use from the 1890's). The N Gauge Society kit represents a one-off vehicle built by a pre-grouping Welsh company. Building a model of an LSWR vehicles of similar appearance is discussed in the section on Kit Bashing

Fig___ Carriage truck, 'implement wagon' and Lowmac models

Models of LNWR carriage truck, MR and NER implement wagons

The photo below shows a Cheshire Lines Committee 6 wheeled furniture van truck carrying its intended load. Note the van is actually horizontal when loaded, the apparent dip to the rear is due to distortion caused by using a macro lens on a cheap camera (I didn't have the model to hand to re-photograph).

Model of furniture van on a six wheeled furniture van truck

On the model the sides are a constant height, forming a distinct well in the centre. This was common practice up to the early part of the twentieth century but later designs had the sides cut down following the contours of the floor and forming a slight lip at either side of the well. This model was based on a drawing which did not make it clear which kind of side was used, however as it required a removable load, the higher sides were more appropriate. Modelling the van load is discussed in the section on Cargo & Wagon Loads.

Model of furniture truck showing the securing rings and loading pulleys

The floor of these wagons was usually fitted with securing rings along the sides, examples were built with four, six or eight such rings, and set into either end was a pulley. Horses cannot push using standard harnesses so to load the van onto the wagon a rope was taken round the pulley at the far end of the wagon, allowing a horse to be used to pull the van onto the wagon.

From about 1900 smaller road vehicles and private motor cars were moved in vans fitted with doors at the ends, these were usually called 'Covered Carriage Trucks' or CCT's. These CCT's were intended for private carriages and motor cars and hence would often be required to travel attached to passenger trains. They were therefore often classed as 'non passenger coaching stock' and as such were painted in simplified coach livery. Some of these were quite small, the Midland Railway and later the Great Western Railway both built CCTs with a ten foot wheel base. The small pre grouping vehicles lasted in service into the late 1930's, the later Big Four designs remained in use into the early years of British Railways.

With the increase in motor car production in the 1920's more Covered Carriage Trucks were built and the wheelbase tended to increase. The GWR built some longer wheelbase vehicles which they called Damo B (ten built in 1925, twenty foot over headstocks), Damo A (fifteen built in 1925 with another twenty in 1929, thirty foot over head stocks) and Asmo (one hundred built in 1929/30, thirty three foot over headstocks). Although all three could be seen in passenger trains not all were piped for vacuum brakes and they were classed as goods stock by the GWR. P D Marsh offer a white metal kit of an SR utility van which fits onto a modified Peco long wheelbase chassis. The kit is supplied alternative end doors for the CCT version. Modelling various CCT's is discussed in the section on Kit Bashing.

Fig ___ Covered carriage truck models

Model of a Midland Railway CCT which had a ten foot wheelbase

The GWR 'Mogo' motor car wagon (built from 1933) was a standard GWR van fitted with new ends comprising two hinged doors and a drop-down section at the bottom, this can be easily modelled using a Peco or P D Marsh ventilated van kit. My model is based on the Peco kit, I carved and sanded the ends flat, scribed in planking detail and added strapping from 10x20 thou strip. The P D Marsh kit can use new ends made up from 1mm scribed card and microstrip details. Mogos were also used for conventional traffic the vehicle securing equipment being stored inside the van. The Midland Railway covered carriage truck started life as a Peco 'standard' van kit, new sides were added, recessed to allow the framing to be added using strip.

During the First World War the railways moved numbers of new aeroplanes in kit form. The fuselage would be shipped separately from the wings and usually without the engine. The railways built and converted a number of vehicles for this work including flat wagons on redundant four or six wheeled coach chassis and CCT type vans. The vans were often marked Aeroplane Van although they could also be used as CCT's. My aeroplane van model was made for a 1920's light railway, it is based on an NER design but I needed it in a hurry so I simply modified a Hornby Minitrix long wheelbase van, this has the correct roof profile but is rather too long. A more accurate model can be made using a cut-down Peco pallet van with the ends sanded flat and detailed with strip and new sides from planked card.

Fig___ Aeroplane van (freelance but based on an NER design)

Minitrix van, sides sanded flat, detailadded from strip, side doors from 10 thou card

Where cars and light commercial vehicles were moved in bulk, for example van chassis being shipped to the factory where the body was added, the pre-war companies used old coach underframes with the body removed and a simple wooden floor added. The LMS converted a lot of old Midland Railway coach underframes to this use in the later 1930's. These vehicles offer a possible use for Lima Mk.1 British Railways coaches which were under scale length (about 57 foot instead of 62 foot)). You need to cut away the battery boxes from the underframe trussing but this is not too difficult. If you have a spare Farish 'suburban' coach underframe the job is even easier. The battery boxes need to be cut from the underframe (this is easy as the frames can be removed and the plastic is soft). I have not yet found a good illustration showing the deck of these vehicles but I understand from correspondence with members of the uk.railways newsgroup that the deck was made up of wooden planking and securing lugs were fitted to the sides. These lugs were used for straps which were passed round the axles of the cars (this was back when cars had axles of course) Later BR built examples had channels in the deck and no apparent lugs for securing the cars in place. All that is required for the body is some Slaters 1mm scribed card for the floor and plastic card for the low sides, for the later types with the channels in the deck three strips of planked card laid onto a sheet of 10 thou card would serve rather well.

The Big Four had various telegraphic code names for these wagons but from about 1952 they were all coded Carflat and BR built further examples both for transporting new cars from the factories and for moving private vehicles (ie the Motorail service). Motorail services allowed people to take their car with them on the train to save driving long distances. These latter services are discussed in the section on Freight Operations - Non Passenger Coaching Stock.

The Motorail vehicles had a low side rail, this can be modelled using brass rod or (if feeling lazy) by using thin brass rod for the rail and OO scale brass handrail knobs for the supports. In the early 1980's Geoffrey Davis rent-a-car also used carflats built for the Motorail service to move their cars about the country (I was not able to find out when this traffic started or ended however).

Fig___ Bocar for new cars (coded carflat) and a Geoffrey Davis rent-a-car carflat

Bocar type vehicle that has been recoded carflat and the Motorail type flat used by Geoffrey Davis

In the 1960's, 70's and 80's British Railways and the rolling stock leasing firms built a range of specialised vehicles for transporting new motor cars going to dealerships, these are described in the section on Air Braked Rolling Stock.

Up to the 1970's there was a great deal of inter-factory traffic in components. Some of these components were rather large, for example it was quite common for one factory to build the chassis and another to add the body. The chassis or the bodies were often moved by rail. In the 1920's the GWR built some special vans with tarpaulin sides for carrying car bodies from Oxford to Coventry. These were originally built on forty five foot long 'Macaw' bogie flat wagons with characteristic heavy under trussing and coded BOCAR but the loads were too light to justify using such heavy vehicles. In 1934 a number of four wheeled coach underframes with lengths ranging from about twenty nine foot to thirty two foot were converted for this work (BOCAR B) and some thirty two foot bogie coaches (BOCAR A) were also re-bodied for this traffic. More of the bogie A type were built just after the Second World War and they continued in use into the early British Railways era carrying car bodies from the Pressed Steel Company works at Swindon. The ends on all types should be about 12mm high for an N Gauge model.


Modelling these vehicles is not too difficult, the chassis for the four wheeled GWR vans presents the biggest problem but a Peco fifteen foot brake van chassis with the foot boards removed and extended with a short length cut from a similar chassis could be used. The Graham Farish fifty seven foot coach chassis can be used with the battery boxes removed as described above. The ends can be made from 1mm scribed card and the sides can be made from paper or plastic card with a covering of crumpled and smoothed out cigarette paper. The roof represents the biggest problem, you can roll one from thin metal or for a plastic strip round a tin can using hot water but the easy option is to beg a second hand Venetian blind and cute strips from that.

The LMS also built a number of Bocars, I believe these were broadly similar in appearance to the bogie GWR types, but I am unable to confirm the date of introduction or exact dimensions. Some LMS bocars were open car transporters as described above, again I cannot confirm their date of introduction.

There were also a number of air braked vans built for components traffic, these are discussed in the section on Goods Rolling Stock Design - Air Braked Stock.

High capacity vehicles

Railway vehicles up to about thirty foot long could run on a single chassis with four or six wheels, although the tight curves in some locations meant there were often restrictions on the longer stock. Where heavier loads were expected or where the vehicle was longer than this the body was mounted on separate swivelling trucks, called bogies. Usually these bogies were four wheeled but where exceptionally heavy loads were anticipated six wheeled bogies were built. One of the early large dining coaches actually had eight wheels on each bogie.

In the 1880's there were experiments with larger vehicles, interest having been provoked by the success of large rolling stock on American railways. Several companies built large bogie wagons for minerals, mainly for moving locomotive coal. The GWR and the Great Central for example both used forty ton bogie coal wagons and the Caledonian Railway built some bogie iron ore wagons with a thirty ton capacity. The GWR Loco Coal wagon is sketched under Available Models, Graham Farish, the GC and CR wagons are sketched below.

The large bulk mineral wagons were relatively successful, but large general goods stock was restricted to movement between major centres. Prior to the Second World War about ninety percent of the freight traffic carried by the railways (other than bulk minerals) involved large numbers of small consignments being shipped to many different destinations. General goods took too long to load by hand into the big vans and open wagons and it was impractical to hold a vehicle until it was full. The four wheelers had reached an average twelve tons capacity a typical wagon load was only about six tons, for which a fleet of smaller capacity wagons was more efficient. In America where the bogie wagon had been developed the pattern of freight movement was different, journeys tended to be longer and the large capacity wagons were of more use.

Few general merchandise vehicles were actually put into service at the time (the GWR built a single bogie open wagon) but the small numbers of large high capacity vehicles were built at intervals for the following fifty years. The GWR wagon ended its days carrying paper between Penarth Docks and a paper mill at Ely (near Cardiff). The the sketch shows its final incarnation as a four plank wagon with two doors per side, suitable for periods from about 1920 to 1937. The bogies were a plate frame type similar to the old style coach bogies but with a shorter wheelbase, these would be difficult to model.

Fig ___ GWR bogie open wagon GWR bogie open wagon

Thirty ton bogie open general merchandise wagons were also tried by the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway and Great Northern Railway.

Some traffic such as fish was by its nature suited to larger than average wagons although these had relatively low payloads due to the way the fish had to be carried to avoid crushing. Both the Great Central and North Eastern railway built some very large fish vans, including some bogie stock.

The other disadvantages of large bogie stock were that it usually required a locomotive to move it, the all-up weight was more than a lot of industrial tracks could carry and clearances on curves in some locations were too tight for them. Railway locomotives are expensive machines, steam engines were relatively labour intensive and temperamental, men and horses were generally readily available and considerably cheaper.

Even the bulk minerals side had its problems with large wagons as the facilities for wagon handling had been built with smaller vehicles in mind. A good example is the coal hoists in the Welsh docks. These lifted wagons up a tower and emptied the coal by tipping the wagon over a chute. The largest wagons the hoists were designed to take were the GWR twenty ton four wheeled coal wagons and could they not handle the much larger bogie wagons. In Britain the high capacity vehicles remained very much the exception rather than the rule and it was the 1970's before larger vehicles became commonplace. They do however make attractive models.

Fig ___ Large capacity vehicles Sketches showing a selection of large capacity rolling stock

The sketch of the GC bogie open is from an illustration in a book by O. S. Nock. This was a thirty ton all steel mineral wagon built by the Great Central Railway around the turn of the century. Note the body overhangs the sides of the chassis and the T section external straps are continued down at an angle to the bottom of the solebars.

The iron bodied bogie van is a Great Western Railway design, the first examples were built in 1904. These vans were used for high speed goods trains from Bristol and Avonmouth docks to London and Cardiff.

The Great Northern Railway open wagon was introduced in 1921 specifically for the carriage of bricks from the brick fields near Peterborough to the London market.

The Caledonian Railway 30 ton 'ore' wagon was used to supply the iron and steel works around Glasgow.

The North Eastern Railway bogie hopper was used to carry coal from a colliery to Blyth docks, where it emptied into ships via a raised wooden 'staith'. There were about a hundred of these unfitted NER hopper wagons built but they were run in short trains to suit the way the colliery worked. It is worth pointing out that the Gross Loaded Weight of the impressive looking NER hopper wagon was about fifty six and a half tons but the load carried was smaller than the modern and much smaller PGA four wheeler 'aggregates' hopper wagons.

Go to top of page

International Good Guys ~ Making the world a better place since 1971 ~ Site maintained by Disabled Access to Computing
All material Copyright © Mike Smith 2003 unless otherwise credited